HeimatERBE operates such sites as have a mining history (and were consequently under mining supervision), among others.
Within the framework of the respective final operating plan procedures and the associated release from mining supervision, these sites have been partially revegetated (for geological and geotechnical reasons) (a), but have predominantly not been revegetated (b).
1. Greening/planting is a matter of erosion control—as is often the case, for example, on mine waste dumps. Questions of biotope development and species protection have—at least so far—been irrelevant (we do not rule out the possibility that HeimatERBE will motivate legislation and the executive branch to be more demanding in recultivation measures here in the future). In these cases, the prospect of ecological development only arises through HeimatERBE and its partners.
2 As a rule, however, HeimatERBE sites have seen subsequent (industrial) uses after mining. With this subsequent use, the recultivation obligation of the former mine operators expired. A typical example of this is our Ewald 5 site (former ventilation site). A concrete plant, a cement factory, a poultry farm and construction logistics (disposal area) were operated there partly in parallel, but mainly after its use as a mine. Recultivation did not take place at any time. The condition of this site today reflects this.
Thus, no one is accountable or even responsible for making these sites viable for the future or, even better, for the future of our grandchildren. Their ecological and social revaluation is a remedial action, which HeimatERBE and its partners carry out voluntarily and in the service of present and future generations. Our plans foresee the ecological development of the sites for many decades to come, making them once again into productive future ecosystems for us humans as well. If we do not do it, no one will do it for the sites we have acquired.